This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] RIPE DB development process: Numbered Work Items
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB development process: Numbered Work Items
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB development process: Numbered Work Items
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Stolpe
stolpe at resilans.se
Tue Apr 26 16:00:46 CEST 2016
+1 Cheers, Daniel On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, William Sylvester wrote: > Job, > > This is a great initiative, I fully support this process. Thanks for putting this together. > > Billy > >> On Apr 25, 2016, at 1:35 PM, Job Snijders <job at instituut.net> wrote: >> >> Dear team, >> >> Reflecting back upon the last 18 months, the chairs feel that we as a >> group can do better to make it easier to track and discuss ideas in a >> structurered way. Therefore, we propose a process/vehicle which we call >> "Numbered Work Items (NWI)". The goal of this proces is to make it >> simpler to learn the current status of a proposal, and in which court >> the ball lays. >> >> kickstart: To kickstart the proces, any db-wg participant can email the >> chairs with a snippet of text (a rough problem statement) and >> formally ask the chairs to make it a work item. The chairs then can >> say "yes" and assign a number, or "no". If a number was assigned, >> the work item will be routed through three phases. >> >> phase 1: problem definition >> In this phase as group we'll work on formulating an exact problem >> definition: text goes back and forth in the working group, example >> cases of the problem are provided. In a 2 or 3 weeks timeframe the >> chairs declare consensus on the problem statement of NWI. >> >> phase 1 output: clearly defined problem statement, or a conclusion >> we cannot agree upon a problem statement definition. If the latter >> is true, the NWI cannot proceed to phase 2. >> >> phase 2: solution definition >> solution finding: people can propose solutions to a work item's >> problem statement. Solutions can come from RIPE NCC staff, or any >> working group member. RIPE NCC may offer an implementation analysis >> on proposed solutions or aspects of solutions. >> >> For the NWI to move to phase 3, RIPE NCC has to provide the group >> with a summary of their understanding of the solution, and the >> chairs declare consensus on the group's acceptance of this summary. >> >> phase 3: development & deployment phase >> RIPE NCC writes the code, sets timelines what happens when, >> documents the transitions/migration plan if applicable. >> >> finish: when the change has been deployed in the production environment. >> >> Every month, someone will email the group with an overview of all open >> Work Items, a brief summary of the NWI, the phase they are in and >> possibly in who's court the ball is and the next action. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Job _________________________________________________________________________________ Daniel Stolpe Tel: 08 - 688 11 81 stolpe at resilans.se Resilans AB Fax: 08 - 55 00 21 63 http://www.resilans.se/ Box 45 094 556741-1193 104 30 Stockholm
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB development process: Numbered Work Items
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB development process: Numbered Work Items
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]