[db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:54:35PM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> I think that if there is a last-modified field, it should always be
> accurate.  And, since the objects were modified, that should have
> updated the fields.
> 
> I'm torn on the notify emails, though.  I can see they would create an
> immense amount of support tickets, but on the other hand, as a producer
> of db objects I want to know what changed in my objects _especially_ when
> I didn't change them myself.

This.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20160419/2bdb9ba5/attachment.sig>