This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dickinson, Ian
Ian.Dickinson at sky.uk
Tue Apr 19 11:57:12 CEST 2016
Is there any way I can register a "please leave my objects alone" request? I don't care that there were once rules about descr: I can edit my objects if I choose to. Ian -----Original Message----- From: db-wg [mailto:db-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Piotr Strzyzewski Sent: 17 April 2016 18:53 To: Tim Bruijnzeels Cc: Database WG Subject: Re: [db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 05:50:02PM +0200, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: Tim > As announced on Wednesday we reverted the formatting change introduced by the "descr:" clean-up. Out of 93,015 objects, 323 were not reverted automatically because the user had made changes since the script ran. In cases where users fixed the whitespace we left the objects as they are. We have dealt with the others on case by case basis - taking care that we only revert the formatting problems we caused. > > This means that "descr:" is back for the moment. > > With regards to the warning given about this change. It was a conscious decision not to send notification for 93,015 objects because this would overwhelm our support queue with questions, regarding what we believed was change that was discussed in this working group, and that would have little or no operational impact. But as Job mentioned, even though this change was discussed at length in this working group, not warning ncc-announce in advance was an oversight. > > Going forward we suggest that we postpone the clean-up, warn ncc-announce in advance, and only run the clean-up some time later allowing stakeholders to be warned, and possible follow-up discussion to be had in this working group. Thanks for that. I suggest that we postpone this for no more than one month from now. If there will be an extensive discussion here or at the ncc-announce, we can always extend this time. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl Information in this email including any attachments may be privileged, confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your system. You should not reproduce, distribute, store, retransmit, use or disclose its contents to anyone. Please note we reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communication through our internal and external networks. SKY and the SKY marks are trademarks of Sky plc and Sky International AG and are used under licence. Sky UK Limited (Registration No. 2906991), Sky-In-Home Service Limited (Registration No. 2067075) and Sky Subscribers Services Limited (Registration No. 2340150) are direct or indirect subsidiaries of Sky plc (Registration No. 2247735). All of the companies mentioned in this paragraph are incorporated in England and Wales and share the same registered office at Grant Way, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5QD.
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] db 1.86 and descr objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]