[db-wg] Locking unmaintained PERSON and ROLE objects in the RIPE Database

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 01:08:44PM +0100, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 02:02:42PM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
>> In English, "you" can be either 2nd person singular, or 2nd person
>> plural.  I personally could use it to refer to any or all of the DB-WG,
>> the DB-WG Admins, RIPE, or the RIPE NCC.
>>
>
> Semantics and accusations aside, Denis is not wrong on the issue
> of the locked objects.
>> From a data protection PoV, leaving them locked but visible is
> *exactly* the wrong thing to do. If they are non-verifiable,
> delete them. Do it NOW. If that causes issues with objects that
> reference the locekd objects, replace the reference with a
> template object or something until it can be replaced.

Good point.

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl