[db-wg] Locking unmaintained PERSON and ROLE objects in the RIPE Database

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:00:45AM +0200, denis wrote:

Denis

>> Taking your arguments stated above, I once again (this time more clear)
>> say that rolling back the change to allow changes to the PERSON object
>> name would _not_ have fixed the problem.
>
> Maybe not, but it would have been a harmless change. Your action has 

This change has been discussed and expected in this community at least
from the year 2000. And has been checked by You in 2014 with RIPE NCC's
legal team. I haven't seen any technical, legal, procedural (nor any
other) objections raised by You under issue 221
(https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/whois/issues/221).
What has changed during last 1.5 year?

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl