This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Piotr Strzyzewski Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu Oct 22 13:11:12 CEST 2015

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:55:07PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote:

Dear Job, WG Members

> [ exec summary: I'd like to see a round of +1's if you agree with the
> proposal and my small addition at the end. ]

[cut]
 
> When the two steps above have been completed, it seems to me that the
> RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT maintainer can be deleted all together from the
> database, and we rely on the business rule as implemented in #1.
> 
> I am happy to hear none of the two steps are "technically difficult".
> 
> +1 from me

+1

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]