This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] [members-discuss] ripe objects as single text field
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [members-discuss] ripe objects as single text field
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [members-discuss] ripe objects as single text field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
dbwg at c4inet.net
Wed Nov 25 17:51:47 CET 2015
F'up to db-wg as I think it really belongs here. On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:07:35PM +0100, Alex Band wrote: >The option to edit an existing object in a single text area is >functionality that was used very infrequently according to our >statistics. We decided to leave it out of the first phase of the >redesign, as most people use email or scripting to update the >RIPE Database in a single text area. If there is a lot of >demand, we'll implement that option as well for the web >interface as well. I, for one, want that back. I use it almost exclusively. While syncupdates works, it is unnecessary effort to copy/paste the object into another page. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [members-discuss] ripe objects as single text field
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [members-discuss] ripe objects as single text field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]