This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] [routing-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [routing-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [routing-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sat Nov 7 01:22:53 CET 2015
>>> I know my employer uses the rr.ntt.net instance on a daily basis. >> yes, i built that and heas has done cool stuff. does your employer >> register in ARIN or APNIC irr? < light goes on?> > We encourage anyone to register their routes in the appropiate IRR, > especially when that IRR offers strong guarantees about the authenticity > of the route-object. does ntt register its own routes in the irrs of APNIC, ARIN, etc? that is a binary question. > I'll take your ad-hominem-employer argument exuse me! you brought up your employer, not i. and you have not answered my question. > However, the discussion at hand seems to me to be about the data > consumption side, I feel that you raised the implicit question "Are > RIR's IRR relevant?" to which my answer is YES. unfortunately, the answer for many operators is NO. they voted with their feet. you can say what they SHOULD do. my family has a lot of jokes about how the world should be. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [routing-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [routing-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]