This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] History lost ...
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bengt Gördén
bengan at resilans.se
Tue May 19 17:19:55 CEST 2015
Den 2015-05-19 14:44, Piotr Strzyzewski skrev: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:45:12PM +0200, Wilfried Woeber wrote: >> Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 05:42:59PM +0200, Daniel Suchy wrote: >> [...] >>> From my point of view, there was no formal proposal to discuss. Just an >>> informal question by Eric. It is even unclear which objects are expected >>> to be visible. >> IIRC there were a couple of quite informal discussions about this Q, >> some of them maybe even in the hallways :-) > I have to admit that I deliberately not mentioned them, since they were > (as you wrote) informal. I do believe, that interested parties should > move those informal discussions to this mailing list. I distinctly remember that we were asked if we wanted to have the deleted objects viewable. In fact it was at RIPE 66 in Dublin. I'd like to think that this is formal enough to proceed to next level. Slide 14. https://ripe66.ripe.net/presentations/186-DB_Update-66.pdf 13m30s in https://ripe66.ripe.net/archives/video/1174/ I asked about it after RIPE 67. https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2013-November/004193.html -- Bengt Gördén Resilans AB
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]