This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Database release 1.79.1 deployed to RC environment
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Database release 1.79.1 deployed to RC environment
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Database release 1.79.1 deployed to RC environment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu May 7 10:56:00 CEST 2015
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:52:07AM +0200, Peter Koch wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:31:23AM +0200, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: > > > > As far as I know this was not explicitly specified beforehand, so it > > > would be good to have a clear WG consensus call on this now. > > > > +1 > > ref ambiguity: OK for the consensus call or OK for the proposed behaviour? I agree with Tim that this was nos explicitly specified beforehand, so OK for the consensus call. Sorry for being unclear. :) Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Database release 1.79.1 deployed to RC environment
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Database release 1.79.1 deployed to RC environment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]