This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Randy Bush randy at psg.com
Fri Jun 26 22:54:08 CEST 2015

>>   o there are operators at euro ixen which require peers' routes be
>>     registered in ripe irr.  we don't have to like it, it's just
>>     business; get over it.
> 
> from the point of view of ixp operations, insisting in ripe-irr is
> neither necessary nor a good idea.

i gave up trying to explain that to peers a long time ago.

and note that, with one mouth, job has said that the ripe irr is the
only one he will trust.

randy

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]