This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at ntt.net
Fri Jun 26 09:10:48 CEST 2015
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 08:14:49AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > > If the address space is assigned by a different RIR then Creating a > > Route Object in RIPE should be disallowed. > > sigh, let's try once more > o there are operators at euro ixen which require peers' routes be > registered in ripe irr. we don't have to like it, it's just > business; get over it. > o there are folk who peer at those same ixen whose address space > was not assigned by ripe ncc. Which IXPs? You are referring to route servers? In November 2014 the group had some on and offline discussion about setting a different value for the "source:" attribute in case the space covered by the route-object was non-ripe-managed. https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2014-November/004421.html I still think this is a sound idea and am waiting on some external factors to make this reality. Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]