This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Temporary origins
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Havard Eidnes
he at uninett.no
Thu Jun 25 21:17:12 CEST 2015
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 09:15:46AM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: >>Already today the RIPE database supports this, you can create >>multiple route-objects covering the same prefix but with >>different "origin:" values. > > I didn't know this. IMO, the saner way to go about that would be > to have one route: object with a multiple (allowed) origin: > values. Should be easier to evaluate programmatically, too. The problem with that is that the authorization for the maintenance of such a "mixed" object becomes highly problematical. > Of course, this wouldn't be practical if it required > authorisation from the inetnum: owner and every ASN owner on the > list. Exactly. Think of the "route" objects in the IRR as "these may be announced", not "these *are* being announced", and in a transition phase for a prefix (re-homing to another ISP), two route objects for the same route will be required. Regards, - Håvard
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]