This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] NCC still enforcing descr: content
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ad-hoc RIPE db-wg meeting at IETF93
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] NCC still enforcing descr: content
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Saner
jan at trick77.com
Mon Jul 27 18:41:29 CEST 2015
Hello Since the NCC still seems to heavy-handedly revert changes to descr: in AUT-NUM, INETNUM and INETNUM6 I’m wondering what the current status of the implementation mentioned by Tim in a post to this list from February is: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2015-February/004496.html Quote: ----------------------------------------------------------- "> When will this change go into effect? We were thinking of mid April, for two reasons: 1) This gives the working group enough time to comment. 2) While the RIPE NCC has finished the effort to ensure that the org-id (and name) are set up correctly for all INETNUM and INET6NUM objects, we are still finalising this work for AUT-NUM objects. We expect that we will finish this effort in about 6 weeks. For consistency it would be easiest to change this for all resource types simultaneously." ----------------------------------------------------------- I personally know a case where the NCC went as far as to ignore German “umlauts” in the name and deliberately spell it wrong in the descr: field of the guy’s AUT-NUM object. When he tried to set it right (ae (ä) instead of a), the NCC reverted the change. Then there’s a case where someone tried to remove his middle name from the descr: field —> reverted. Another post on the same subject: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/2015-June/001737.html Looks like there’s still a lot of energy wasted in those descr fields now that the org pointer is mandatory. Cheers
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ad-hoc RIPE db-wg meeting at IETF93
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] NCC still enforcing descr: content
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]