This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] History lost ...
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
William Sylvester
william.sylvester at addrex.net
Thu Feb 12 20:38:19 CET 2015
Hi, I support this and also was wondering about associated objects like routing objects and in-addrs? This is also an issue for claiming an old block where a locked maintainer was used. It would be nice to have the unlocked maintainer apply for objects related to the block not just the inetnum for example. Thanks, Billy On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Erik Bais <ebais at a2b-internet.com<mailto:ebais at a2b-internet.com>> wrote: Hi, With the IP transfers going in full swing, it is quite common these days that the larger prefix size is broken up in to multiple smaller prefixes.. As the original prefix is split up, the IPRA's remove the original prefix from the database .. and with it .. the history ... Is there a way to preserve that data to be able to still lookup the data using -list-versions or -show-version # ... Regards, Erik Bais -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20150212/c6b41b1e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]