This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Proposal to allow UTF8
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to allow UTF8
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: make phone number optional in person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Newton
andy at arin.net
Thu Apr 23 17:30:30 CEST 2015
On Apr 23, 2015, at 9:41 AM, George Michaelson <ggm at apnic.net<mailto:ggm at apnic.net>> wrote: Other consumers of the WHOIS could feel differently about it. Aren’t other consumers of the RIPE Whois systems doing IRR mirroring? Would the data stores of those systems store UTF-8 without croaking? I do not know what types of data stores are used for the various IRRs, but I’ve certainly witnessed relational databases setup for ASCII/Latin1 that would throw errors if told to store UTF-8. I know that our IRR only stores Latin1 (though we don’t mirror). -andy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20150423/9fe84fb9/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to allow UTF8
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: make phone number optional in person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]