This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Replacing "changed" with "last-modified" implementation plan
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Replacing "changed" with "last-modified" implementation plan
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Replacing "changed" with "last-modified" implementation plan
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Fri Sep 12 11:36:43 CEST 2014
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:20:07PM +0200, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: > Following the consensus call we looked into the proposal to replace ?changed? with ?created? and ?last-modified?. [cut] I like this plan/proposal/schedule. It is extremely careful, which is good in this situation. One question: are you going to introduce --list-versions and --show-version for those object which doesn't support them now. This could lead to some problems (data protection, data retention). However this could be also more consistent with the removal of the changed lines. Would you elaborate on that? Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Replacing "changed" with "last-modified" implementation plan
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Replacing "changed" with "last-modified" implementation plan
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]