[db-wg] source: field for non RIPE address space

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:35:56AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> >>> Correct route object prefix length, wrong origin & visible in BGP DFZ: 
> >> is this not legitimate in a make before break origin transfer?  of
> >> course, many will forget to clean old up afterward.
> > I have not attempted to figure out why those route objects are there.
> 
> is there a second route: object for the same prefix which is correct?

Quickly ran something for IPv4:

{'AFRINIC': 99,
'APNIC': 10,
'ARIN': 112,
'LACNIC': 1,
'RIPE': 6200}

This means there are 99 objects which fall within AfriNIC administrated
space which have an origin not seen in the DFZ, but a _correct_ route
object already exists.

Kind regards,

Job