This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] restrict usage of RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] restrict usage of RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] -V database query semantics
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Thu Nov 20 14:14:53 CET 2014
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:16:21PM +0100, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:12:44PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:00:03PM +0100, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: > > > > Would it be an idea to prevent objects from being updated/created when > > > > they carry a "mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT" attribute? > > > > > > What about delete? > > > > We cannot delete these objects, that would wipe out a large portion of > > routing information regarding Africa. That is not acceptable. I solely > > mean to reject the update/creation of an object if it contains this > > line: > > > > mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT > > > > Because the above line is a security risk for the object, everybody > > knows the password for RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT. > > I have been misunderstood. What about extending the protection to covers > also the inability of deletion? You mean that mntner 'RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT' cannot delete objects? That sounds good as well. Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] restrict usage of RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] -V database query semantics
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]