This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] RIPE Bulk WHOIS change anonymization
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] forced remarks (Was: RIPE Database Release 1.73.1 deployed)
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE Bulk WHOIS change anonymization
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Micha
michael_oelke at freenet.de
Tue Jun 17 15:22:56 CEST 2014
Hi Ripe Team, I asked your DB Managers and they suggested to forward my question to you. I hope that I don't unnecessarily spam you, but I couldn't find this in your db-wg archive with a quick look. Question: Is it possible to keep the actual "date" of the "changed:" line unanonymized? By now it's always: changed: unread at ripe.net 20000101 I get that you want to protect personal data like the mail adresses in this field, but I can't see how this date could harm anyone. I would like to use this date field for research purpose and I am happy about your answers! Michael Oelke Institute of Information Systems Humboldt-University Berlin
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] forced remarks (Was: RIPE Database Release 1.73.1 deployed)
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE Bulk WHOIS change anonymization
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]