This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] AS-NULL
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] AS-NULL
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] AS-NULL
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Mon Dec 15 23:42:22 CET 2014
On 15/12/14 16:26, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 15/12/2014 16:13, Job Snijders wrote: >> Can you elaborate on the use of AS-NULL? Isn't it common place to use >> something like "NOT ANY"? > "NOT ANY" is not the same as AS-NULL - they're not interchangeable. > > AS-NULL is a convenience placeholder token for where might be a need to > have an empty as-set. My particular itch today involved needing to use an > AS-SET of some form, but where the contents didn't particularly matter. It > was more convenient to use an empty set rather than a set with some members > in it because that gave an element of semantic consistency. > > There are other similar sets in the various irrdbs, e.g. AS-EMPTY occurs in > RADB. This suggests that there is at least one other person in the world > who needs this sort of construct. > I don't see any particular problem with the NCC creating and owning such an empty set Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] AS-NULL
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] AS-NULL
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]