This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] AS-NULL
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] AS-NULL
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] AS-NULL
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at ntt.net
Mon Dec 15 17:13:47 CET 2014
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 04:05:14PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: > For various reasons, the AS-NULL as-set scratched a rather pressing > itch earlier today. > > In the interests of neutrality, would the RIPE NCC be interested in > maintaining ownership of this object as an empty set? Can you elaborate on the use of AS-NULL? Isn't it common place to use something like "NOT ANY"? For what it's worth: I have no objections to RIPE maintaining an empty AS-SET named AS-NULL. Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] AS-NULL
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] AS-NULL
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]