This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Proposal: DB object syntax change
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: DB object syntax change
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: DB object syntax change
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Fri Apr 25 10:28:50 CEST 2014
On 24/04/14 13:46, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 03:37:34PM +0100, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: > > Dear WG > >> I would like to propose syntax change of the role attribute of the ROLE >> object in the RIPE DB. Bellow you can find all details. > [cut] > > Since there was no objections and there was some support for this idea, > can we move forward and implement this change? > > I see no objections to this. I think there was clear consensus in the WG. NCC, can we go ahead with this please? Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: DB object syntax change
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: DB object syntax change
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]