This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Historical data in ripe-db. whois with "--list-versions"
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Historical data in ripe-db. whois with "--list-versions"
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Historical data in ripe-db. whois with "--list-versions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denis Walker
denis at ripe.net
Mon Jun 17 17:10:46 CEST 2013
Dear Bengt Gördén, I had a look into the database tables and unfortunately this is one of those objects that hits those technical problems we referred to. This means our history service cannot 'see' this object in the database. However I also checked the history information manually and I can say that this object was created on 20020609 and there were no earlier versions of it. It is on our ToDo list to investigate the technical issues and see if there is any way we can fill in these gaps in the early history. Regards Denis Walker Business Analyst RIPE NCC Database Group On 17/06/2013 14:38, Bengt Gördén wrote: > Hi, > > I've been using this service and I like it. But I ran into a problem, I > think. I'm trying to see the history for 194.228.90.192/26. > > whois -h whois.ripe.net 194.228.90.192/26 <-------- Works. I get an > inetnum for the network > whois -h whois.ripe.net -- "--list-versions 194.228.90.192/26" > <--------- Doesn't work. Provides no revision list > > whois -h whois.ripe.net 194.228.0.0/16 <-------- Works. I get an inetnum > for the network > whois -h whois.ripe.net -- "--list-versions 194.228.0.0/16" <--------- > Works. Gives revision list > > Am I doing something wrong here? I suspect that the /26 inetnum hasn't > changed since 2002 but shouldn't there be at least a rev. 1 for it? Or > is it as it says in the proposal "there might have been cases were some > changes are missing in the history, mainly for technical reasons"? > > regards, > > > /bengan > >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Historical data in ripe-db. whois with "--list-versions"
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Historical data in ripe-db. whois with "--list-versions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]