This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] bug? accepting larger than 32 bit BGP Communities in RPSL
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] bug? accepting larger than 32 bit BGP Communities in RPSL
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] bug? accepting larger than 32 bit BGP Communities in RPSL
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Wed Jan 2 15:35:00 CET 2013
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Kaveh Ranjbar wrote: Hi > Your second question is aimed at the community and we are also > interested to know what community thinks the rules should be. At the > moment for the RIPE Database business rule checks we have a mix of both > scenarios: It seems that checking all various kind of rules during the insert or update process is not a problem of heavy load to the DB. Taking this into account, I'm absolutely for checking the quality of the data wherever it is possible, which means also on the DB. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] bug? accepting larger than 32 bit BGP Communities in RPSL
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] bug? accepting larger than 32 bit BGP Communities in RPSL
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]