This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] whois and 4 byte ASNs

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Oct 22 12:43:32 CEST 2008

On Oct 22, 2008, at 10:46, Joao Damas wrote:

> Why would you use any other whois server for IP/ASNs/RPSL?

Shouldn't the question be "why would anyone use any whois server for  
anything?"? :-)

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]