This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Clean up of unreferenced person/role objects
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] Clean up of unreferenced person/role objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Clean up of unreferenced person/role objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Lenz
slz at baycix.de
Sat Apr 21 01:35:12 CEST 2007
Denis Walker schrieb: > Introduction > ------------ > > According to our database consistency statistics program (dbconstat [1]) we > currently have 460,573 unreferenced person/role objects [2]. Some of these > may be maintained, but are still unreferenced. Any personal data not > referenced by Internet resources do not fit within the purpose of the RIPE > Database. They should not be stored in the RIPE Database beyond a reasonable > 'work in progress' period. [...] so, my 0.02EUR: unreferenced person/role objects should not stay in the RIPE whois db forever and should been cleaned up on a regular basis, i agree since 2001 :-) I don't really know how that vast amount of useless(?) data affects the database operation nowadays (lookup/update times, mirror synchronization , databse sizes ect.), if at all with the current database machines, but the issue is more general. It just makes no real sense to keep them in there. > One time bulk cleanup procedure > ------------------------------- [...] But like some other people i'm not really happy about the "no e-mail notification" thing. Not even for the one-time procedure. I really really would like to have at least the regular update/delete-notificiations. It's just a bad thing to delete something without notifying the "owner". I wouldn't like that to happen to my objects - probably i keep one old Internic person object i copied to the RIPE db some decades ago alive but unreferenced since it's without the xyz-RIPE tag and i don't like to really use it anymore but .... at least i'd like to know if it gets deleted and the WHY in the delete: reason filed. Bottom line: If it's agreed on that it's not possible for the RIPE NCC to send out the notifications for whatever reason, i'd actually rather like to keep the objects there - or take smaller steps so it IS possible to send out notifications (hey, it took so long to re-activate that 'project', so it can't be that time-critical ;-). -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = = Network Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] Clean up of unreferenced person/role objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Clean up of unreferenced person/role objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]