This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
FW: FW: [db-wg] Proposal to deprecate CRYPT-PW authorisation in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): FW: FW: [db-wg] Proposal to deprecate CRYPT-PW authorisation in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): FW: FW: FW: [db-wg] Proposal to deprecate CRYPT-PW authorisation in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Thu Oct 5 21:14:15 CEST 2006
Potapov Vladislav wrote: > Hi! > > ---Max Tulyev--- > In Russia ALL uncertified by goverment cryptographic system is illegal. > So SSL (lirportal) is illegal. But PGP/MD5/CRYPT is NOT illegal, because > it don't do encryption and not interfere with SORM (SORM - a mandatory > part of any ISP in Russia, that do hidden analysis and mirroring some of > traffic to FSB), but only do signatures. > ---- > I can say that you are wrong. There are many proves of that. > I will be so thankful if you will point me to the law ;) > ---Max Tulyev--- > Also, unlike PGP, lirportal can't do safr multiply persons authorization > (i.e. owner of PI space creates route object with his upstream's AS, > signs it, sent to upstream, upstream signs it too and send to RIPE). > ---- > Are we going to discuss a new proposal already instead of existing? :) > Not instead, but in additional. -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): FW: FW: [db-wg] Proposal to deprecate CRYPT-PW authorisation in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): FW: FW: FW: [db-wg] Proposal to deprecate CRYPT-PW authorisation in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]