This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Data Protection Task Force - Ref: RIPE53 DB-WG Draft Agenda V3. item C

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Per Heldal heldal at eml.cc
Thu Oct 5 12:27:16 CEST 2006

On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:10 +0200, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
[snip]

> That's why we changed the proposal to change the NON-REGISTRY into
> OTHER.

Such a cosmetic change is no big deal (except it is pointless). It'll
depend on the work involved I guess.

It would be a whole different issue if the change involved functionality
to specifically support RIPE's work related to the decision to handle
e164 delegations. 


-- 


Per Heldal - http://heldal.eml.cc/

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Data Protection Task Force - Ref: RIPE53 DB-WG Draft Agenda V3. item C

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]