This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] RE: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RE: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antoin Verschuren
Antoin.Verschuren at sidn.nl
Thu Oct 5 09:53:20 CEST 2006
Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 03, leo vegoda <leo at ripe.net> wrote: > >> Do people find org-type values like IANA, RIR, LIR and so on useful? >> No. What would be the point? As Leo pointed out: Looking back into the mail archives for 2003 and 2004 I think the original purpose was to let people know how close to the End User the registration on a block of IP addresses was. If my memory is correct, the org-type was introduced after it was felt that status attribute values like "ALLOCATED-BY-IANA" or "ALLOCATED-BY-RIR" would overburden the status attribute syntax unnecessarily. One of the possible functionality could be that you'd not like to contact certain organisations holding numberblocks when abuse comes from them since you will know these numbers are distributed in a specific fashon, and you'll probably be not reaching an end user. Don't know if such routines are used. Antoin Verschuren Technical Advisor Policy & Business Development SIDN Utrechtseweg 310 PO Box 5022 6802 EA Arnhem The Netherlands T +31 26 3525510 F +31 26 3525505 M +31 6 23368970 E antoin.verschuren at sidn.nl W http://www.sidn.nl/
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RE: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]