This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Suggestion: un-necessary error message
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Suggestion: un-necessary error message
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Suggestion: un-necessary error message
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Streater
tim.streater at dante.org.uk
Thu Jun 15 11:47:42 CEST 2006
At 10:52 15/06/2006, Marco Hogewoning wrote: >On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:23:54PM +0100, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > > Begin forwarded message (extracted from a recent update attempt): > > > > >changed: Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie 20060614 > > >changed: oonagh.oreilly at comreg.ie 20040323 > > >changed: hostmaster at ripe.net 20041222 > > >source: RIPE > > >***Error: The dates in the changed: attributes should be in > > >accending order > > > '20040323' was found after '20060614' > > > > Wouldn't it be just as easy to sort the attributes into the correct > > order > > as to generate an error message? > >Agreed, and as I also just got bitten by this. The strange thing is that >at it also reports 'syntax check passed' first and then spits out the >error. Isn't this a syntax error ? Nothing wrong with the syntax of the statements. It's a semantic matter - there is meaning in the content of the statements that implies an order. However it would seem reasonable that this be fixed up automatically. -- Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Suggestion: un-necessary error message
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Suggestion: un-necessary error message
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]