This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Since when does one need 3 nameservers for inverse?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Announcement Routing Registry Training Courses
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Since when does one need 3 nameservers for inverse?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Wed Feb 8 10:18:43 CET 2006
In the "Reverse Delegation How To": http://www.ripe.net/rs/reverse/reverse_howto.html it states: "NS Servers Ensure you have at least two nameservers that are authoritative for the zone. The resolvable names of these NS servers should be in the NS resource records of the zone. The nameservers should be on different subnets." Yet when I submit a request I get: ***RDNS: (related to set) ERROR (20 points): At least 3 nameservers are required for each properly delegated zone. We found only 2 in your submission. In addition the reverse delegation checker at: http://www.ripe.net/cgi-bin/delcheck/delcheck2.cgi doesn't flag only 2 nameservers as an error. What gives? -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Announcement Routing Registry Training Courses
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Since when does one need 3 nameservers for inverse?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]