[ncc-services-wg] [db-wg] Re: RIPE52 DB-WG Draft Agenda V3

Change of plan: see below.

On 20 Apr 2006, at 20:43, Niall O'Reilly wrote:

> On 20 Apr 2006, at 06:09, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
>
>> Niall O'Reilly wrote:
>>> On 19 Apr 2006, at 15:08, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
>> Option 3
>>>> Z. AOB
>>> I'm not sure whether this is within scope, or
>> Option 1
>>> better mentioned in the NCC-services WG,
>> Option 2
>>> or just simply discussed over coffee with an NCC  person.
>>>
>>> A colleague in a sister organization here in Ireland has recently  
>>> had
>>> an experience which leads me to think that it would be useful to  
>>> have
>>> some consistency checking between address assignments and the
>>> corresponding IN-ADDR.ARPA domains, at least at the /16 level.
>>> See you all next week.
>>> /Niall
>> Let us try to do (2) first, then maybe (1), both before Friday  
>> morning.
>> Then we can still do (3) and try to bring it up in DB under AOB.
>> Wilfried.
>
> Thanks, Wilfried.  That sounds like a plan.

Conversations with a number of people here at RIPE 52, including some
WG-co-chairs and some NCC experts, lead me to believe that this episode
doesn't, on its own, indicate a sufficiently broad class of problems
to warrant action.  We should probably review the position if similar
problems arise in the future.

We don't need to take meeting time for this.

/Niall