This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]

Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Marco d'Itri md at Linux.IT
Wed Oct 12 11:51:26 CEST 2005

On Oct 12, Shane Kerr <shane at ripe.net> wrote:

> We have changed the behaviour of the database so that when you do a "-c"
> lookup, we return the IRT object in the reply. I thought this was the
> desired behaviour. You can see it here:
This is useful, but the desired behavious was to always return the
relevant irt record for inetnum queries, along with the most specific
inetnum object.

-- 
ciao,
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20051012/49a179d3/attachment.sig>

Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]