This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Re: Abuse Complaint procedures
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse Complaint procedures
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: Abuse Complaint procedures
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Nov 7 10:05:14 CET 2005
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:18:30PM +0000, jrfoleyjr at comcast.net <jrfoleyjr at comcast.net> wrote a message of 21 lines which said: > I was looking for an address to report hacker activity to and it > appears that you are a) not in the business b) not equipped to > handle it c) barely qualified to assign blocks of IP addresses so > that the addressee can self-police, unless they are hacker/spammer > organizations. In which case the rest of the worlds choice is to ban > RIPE assigned addresses. Personnally, I would be interested to know first-hand experiences on how ARIN, LACNIC, Afrinic or APNIC handle cracker activity reports (you know, these reports sent more or less at random towards every email addresse that the alleged victim can find). Do they send a special police squad immediately? Do they sue the cracker in the name of the victim? Do they deliver a free and comprehensive technical analysis of the attack? I could continue the list but, since you blocked RIPE addresses, you will probably miss my message :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse Complaint procedures
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: Abuse Complaint procedures
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]