This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Deprecation of the NONE Authentication Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Deprecation of the NONE Authentication Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Deprecation of the NONE Authentication Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Mon Nov 7 09:21:48 CET 2005
At 08:58 AM 07-11-05 +0100, Kristian Larsson wrote: >On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:57:30AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > At 04:52 PM 13-04-04 +0200, Ziya Suzen wrote: > > > > If auth:NONE was deprecated why is the weak password graph constantly > > increasing: > > http://www.ripe.net/projects/dbconstat/protect-weakpass.html >Because people who have auth:NONE are doing more >db changes. >People are lazy and won't change auth scheme. > > > Is auth: NONE still valid or not? >It is not to be used but I don't think there is >anything actually forcing you to switch!? The email below from April 2004 stated: > >Therefore, the plan for MNTNER objects with the NONE authentication > >scheme is: > > > >o Remove "auth: NONE" attributes from all MNTNER objects, by changing > >them to a "remarks:" attribute with a URL explaining the change. I think that would force users to switch since auth=NONE shouldn't exist any longer. -Hank > > > > According to ripe-358 it is not: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/db-query-manual.html > > > > If not, how is NONE being used - or is this graph plotting incorrect info? > > > > -Hank > > > > >Dear Colleagues, > > > > > >As announced at RIPE 47 the NONE authentication scheme will be > > >deprecated. > > > > > >After 26 April 2004 the RIPE Whois Database will not accept updates using > > >the NONE authentication scheme. > > > > > >If you have objects protected by a MNTNER object which has the NONE > > >authentication scheme, please assign another authentication scheme or > > >create another MNTNER object to protect these objects. > > > > > >If you are a RIPE NCC member you can create new MNTNER objects through > > >the LIR Portal or send your update to <auto-dbm at ripe.net>. > > > > > >History and details: > > >-------------------- > > > > > >1. Motivation > > > > > >The RIPE Database protects data from unauthorised modification through > > >the use of references to maintainer objects. The maintainer objects > > >contain an "auth:" attribute which specifiy how a user is > > >authenticated during updates to the database. > > > > > >One of the allowed authentication schemes is "NONE", which is actually > > >not an authentication at all, but rather specifies that no > > >authentication is necessary. NONE is intended to be used consciously, > > >as a notification facility or as a means to tag objects. > > > > > >In April 2003, a proposal was sent to the Database Working Group by > > >Hank Nussbacher: > > > > > > It has come lately to the attention in the Internet security realm > > > that spammers as well as crackers are hijacking IP address space. > > > One easy way to "steal" IP address space is via those that have > > > auth=NONE on their objects. > > > > > >It is likely that in many cases NONE is used simply because it is > > >easy. Currently approximately 500 maintainers use NONE - about 5% of > > >all maintainers. > > > > > > > > >2. Plan > > > > > >Normally with a database cleanup effort, an announcement is sent to > > >the appropriate mailing lists, posted to the RIPE web page, and also > > >sent to the specific users affected. A period of time for cleanup is > > >given. Finally, if the users have not fixed the data then it is > > >modified. > > > > > >However, for the NONE deprecation, it is inadvisable to do this > > >as it means announcing what is in effect a security > > >vulnerability. Also, our operational experience with past cleanups > > >shows that most users do not really participate through the phases of > > >the effort. > > > > > >Therefore, the plan for MNTNER objects with the NONE authentication > > >scheme is: > > > > > >o Announcement only to db-wg mailing list. (This announcement) > > > > > >o Remove "auth: NONE" attributes from all MNTNER objects, by changing > > >them to a "remarks:" attribute with a URL explaining the change. > > > > > >o If that is the only authentication scheme, update the mntner > > >objects, adding MD5-PW with a generated password. > > > > > >o E-mail the "admin-c:" and "tech-c:" of the objects, and the e-mail > > >addresses listed in the "upd-to:" and "mnt-nfy:" attributes of the > > >objects, explaining the change and including the new password if one > > >is added. > > > > > >o Passwords can be requested via an e-mail to <ripe-dbm at ripe.net>. > > > > > >The reply with the password will be sent to the same contacts. After > > >a certain period of time the service will be discontinued. Users > > >wishing to use these maintainers may contact <ripe-dbm at ripe.net> for > > >assistance. > > > > > > > > >3. RIPE-NCC-NONE-MNT > > > > > >A maintainer with NONE authentication, RIPE-NCC-NONE-MNT, was added to > > >objects without any maintainer when the database was converted from > > >RIPE-181 format to RPSL format in April 2001. There is a remark in > > >these objects which includes the following: > > > > > >remarks: The RIPE NCC will never use this maintainer object to > > >remarks: enforce any sort of control over user's objects. > > > > > >It is possible this could have been interpreted to mean that no > > >restriction would ever be added to the object. > > > > > >One use of the RIPE-NCC-NONE-MNT has been to allow the creation of > > >objects representing routing policy for resources not allocated or > > >assigned by the RIPE NCC. This is done by using "mnt-routes: > > >RIPE-NCC-NONE-MNT" or "mnt-lower: RIPE-NCC-NONE-MNT" as appropriate. > > > > > >A new maintainer object will be created for these cases, with a well- > > >known password, published in the object: > > > > > >mntner: RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT > > >descr: This maintainer may be used to create objects to represent > > >descr: routing policy in the RIPE Database for number resources not > > >descr: allocated or assigned from the RIPE NCC. > > >admin-c: RD132-RIPE > > >upd-to: ripe-dbm-notify at ripe.net > > >auth: MD5-PW $1$GUExyzzy$XQtbZHGVqy9GW8BiAckBV1 > > >remarks: ******************************************************* > > >remarks: * The password for this object is 'RPSL', without the * > > >remarks: * quotes. * > > >remarks: ******************************************************* > > >mnt-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT > > >referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT > > >changed: ripe-dbm at ripe.net 20040301 > > >source: RIPE > > > > > >The main use of this maintainer is for INETNUM objects. There are > > >approximately 60000 such objects - about 6% of the inetnums. Updates > > >for objects with RIPE-NCC-NONE-MNT are rare, less than 2% of all > > >updates. > > > > > >For objects using RIPE-NCC-NONE-MNT: > > > > > >o If there are other "mnt-by:" attributes it will be changed to a > > >"remarks:" attribute. > > > > > >o Otherwise, the "mnt-by:" will be changed to RIPE-NCC-LOCKED-MNT, > > >which has a locked password (or PGP key). > > > > > >o A "remarks:" attribute will be added explaining how to generate a > > >maintainer. > > > > > >o An e-mail will be sent to the "admin-c:" and "tech-c:" of the > > >objects, and the e-mail addresses listed in the "notify:" attributes > > >of the objects, explaining the change and giving a URL which will help > > >to generate a new maintainer or assign another existing maintainer. > > > > > >o At the URL, the object will be automatically updated to have a new > > >maintainer. > > > > > >o After a certain period of time the service will be discontinued. > > >Users wishing to use these maintainers may contact ripe-dbm at ripe.net > > >for assistance. > > > > > > > > >4. Other maintainers with "auth: NONE" > > > > > >The RIPE-NCC-PN-NONE-MNT was used to mark PERSON objects not to be > > >deleted in the 2001 person cleanup. It can be removed and the > > >maintainer deleted. > > > > > >The LIM-MNT is used for limericks. It will have a well-known password > > >similar to the RPSL maintainer. It will also be maintained by another > > >maintainer (not itself, as currently). > > > > > >-- > > >Ziya Suzen > > >RIPE NCC > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System > at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Deprecation of the NONE Authentication Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Deprecation of the NONE Authentication Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]