This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] irt object useless

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] irt object useless
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE 50 Report

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Marco d'Itri md at Linux.IT
Sat May 28 00:35:54 CEST 2005

On May 27, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> So if the inetnum: has its own mnt-irt: then show it, but if there is only
> one for the encompassing /16 (or whatever), then show the "parent" irt: -
> otherweise irt: is pretty useless.
I agree with this, but this is not how I read the original proposal.
If this is the new proposed behaviour for default database queries then
I fully support it.

-- 
ciao,
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20050528/1c0ad687/attachment.sig>

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] irt object useless
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE 50 Report

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]