This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] Whois changes

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Whois changes
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse information: quick snapshot

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Fri May 13 13:11:21 CEST 2005

On 11 May 2005, at 00:28, James A. T. Rice wrote:

> Any chance of having changed: with a date (not an email address) back 
> in the default output?

On 13 May 2005, at 10:56, James A. T. Rice wrote:

> I'm curious to the arguements why this would be a bad thing.

If you're suggesting that the default method for displaying the 
'changed'
attribute should be something like

	changed:      (e-mail-not-revealed) 20030929

rather than

	changed:      hostmaster at ripe.net 20030929

I don't see any reason to "hope not", although this was actually my 
first
reaction too, just like Hendrik Voelker.  So, FMPOV, no "bad thing".

OTOH, since -B gives full detail, I'm wondering about the arguments in
favour of committing resources to its implementation.  Is it such an
outstandingly "good thing"?

/Niall

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Whois changes
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse information: quick snapshot

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]