This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Whois changes
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Whois changes
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Whois changes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fredrik Widell
fredrik at sunet.se
Thu May 12 12:05:18 CEST 2005
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Rimas Janusauskas wrote: > > > Hi, > > IMHO preferable solution is to modify "changed:" attribute format: > changed: <e-mail address> > with automatically generated timestamp. > > Such modification also allows exclude errors like "changed:" > attribute order, updates with untouched "changed:" etc. Well.. I have had use of this feature, to be able to change objects without changing the changed-lines, when the ripe hostmasters wrongly changed a couple of thousand of our objects, several times a row. (during arin->ripe movements of old inetnums) So, I dont know, if ripe promise to behave, maybe this is a good thing. > > Best regards, > > Rimas Janusauskas, > Vilnius University Hostmaster > > > > On Wed, 11 May 2005, Shane Kerr wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:13:31 +0200 >> From: Shane Kerr <shane at ripe.net> >> To: Erics <EricS at t-com.net> >> Cc: db-wg at ripe.net >> Subject: Re: [db-wg] Whois changes >> >> Erics wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> i think this is a good idea. >>> The default output should show the last changed date. >>> This could be very helpful for LIRs. >>> >>> >> It is easy for users who need this information to get it -- add the "-B" >> flag to your query. Also, most users of the database are not LIRs. >> >> Relying on the "changed:" attribute to know when objects were updated >> has the problem that there is no error checking on it. A user can put >> almost any "changed:" value that they want. I could update my person >> object today to have this value: >> >> changed: ripe-dbm at ripe.net 19901215 >> >> I think in the past people have suggested a "reliable" timestamp on >> objects in the database, but other people have argued against it. >> >> One suggestion was to add an optional attribute with a reliable >> timestamp that would get generated by the database. This way, if it is >> there you can trust it, but if it is not then you must rely on >> "changed:" attributes or do without any information. >> >> -- >> Shane >> >> > -- Mvh /Fredrik ------------------------------------------------------- KTHNOC, KTH, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden +46 8 790 65 17 -------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Whois changes
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Whois changes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]