[db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse

> > My view. It is valid to add the abuse mailbox to objects that describe 
> > Prrsons or Groups of them (person:, role:, organisation:), but to 
> > implement a reference to them for objects that describe ressources 
> > (inetnum, inet6num, route, ....). 'abuse-c:' for example.
>
> Agreed. Note that this "reference" is irt-mnt. It's annoying that
> requests to have IRT records returned by default have been ignored. I do
> not remember anybody arguing against this, and without this IRT records
> are just dead.

Seconded.

Why was this request ignored?

Regards,

- Håvard