This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Changes for abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Changes for abuse
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Changes for abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Fri Apr 29 20:46:57 CEST 2005
Randy Bush wrote: > > no TLD's that accept e-mail. > > please do not add restrictions which are not in the protocol. agreed in the spirit of RFC 3696, if nothing else. > and there are current email recipients of the form user at tld. As an exercise that's fine, but in this particular case it is calling for trouble. There are some role addresses that should have lower access thresholds, so I'm fine with the test. Even more, it might be useful to check whether the address given ends in a valid TLD and/or an MX RRSet for the domain name eists. -Peter PS: VA had postmaster at va in their SOA and years ago and at that time there was quite some debate about pros and cons already.
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Changes for abuse
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Changes for abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]