[db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK

On Sep 10, Jeroen Massar <jeroen at unfix.org> wrote:

> > Many of these options are not mutually exclusive, i.e. it's probably a
> > good idea, independently from implementing or not abuse-c, to make PGP
> > attributes in IRT records optional and to make the email address in the
> > changed attribute a free form string (it does not /need/ to reference a
> > person object, as long as people in each organization can agree on what
> > should be put there).
> > Is anybody opposed to these changes?
> 
> Nope, changing the e-mail lines to person objects is probably wiser
> indeed. The whois interface could btw hide all the entries between the
> first and the last entry?

Why? If you do not want them to appear in the public database you just
have to edit your object.

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [7938 alwj72cVVwVrA]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20040911/10dd9a30/attachment.sig>