[db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK

On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:00:05PM +0200, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:

>   Please feel free to propose additional topics by either replying to the
>   WG mailing list or in private mail to Nigel (who has volunteered to
>   manage the meeting in Manchester - thank you very much!) and myself.

Hate to come up with it again, but there are various actions points open
on the abuse-c stuff. One of them lists the 'implement whatever concensus
there is on the mailinglist'.

These should already be on the agenda as open action points, but it might
be worth planning some time for discussion or at least an overview of what
the outcome of the mail discussion was.

I can find back 2 detailed proposals on this subject:

From: Shane Kerr <shane at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 14:57:44 +0200
Message-ID: <409F7C48.8070205 at ripe.net>
 
From: Ulrich Kiermayr <ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at>
Subject: [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 10:25:12 +0200
Message-ID: <4099F668.1040508 at univie.ac.at>

The one from Ulrich, on abuse-c reference, met some more 'resistance' as
Shane's proposal on cutting the number of email addresses returned. But
they are also taking a very different approach to solve the problem.

It's hard to say there is consensus on this subject, although in they end
there weren't much comments posted and everybody seems to be happy (or
tired of it).

Grtx,

MarcoH