This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] domain: object normalization
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] domain: object normalization
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] domain: object normalization
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Mon Sep 6 10:54:57 CEST 2004
On 03.09 09:57, Randy Bush wrote: > > you might want to be a bit more in line with internet standards. > apologies for being too off balance here at apnic to give you an > exact ref. but 127.1 is 127.0.0.1 etc. The specific behavior of the RIPE database has been agreed in 1994 and is described in ripe-121. The rationale for this behavior is different from inet_aton(); in particular the typical query is for more than one address and often based on a prefix in slash notation. Using inet_aton() behavior was discussed at the time but considered too confusing in combination with prefix notation and thus not appropriate for the application. Harvard explained this already Changing this behavior will not only confuse human users but also break automated processes. I consider this a Bad Idea. Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] domain: object normalization
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] domain: object normalization
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]