This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] RIPE DB tertiary whois server
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB tertiary whois server
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB tertiary whois server
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Tue Nov 9 00:47:09 CET 2004
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 12:38:53AM +0100, Sascha Lenz wrote: > My main concern wasn't the query-speed but the update-speed though. > I mean, when i supplied an update via auto-dbm i got instant replies, > but the change took about 24 hours or longer to be reflected in the > whois query again. We just had reports that currently DB updates are reflected virtually instantly in the whois server. Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB tertiary whois server
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE DB tertiary whois server
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]