This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Specifying no routes
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Specifying no routes
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Prior
mrp at mrp.net
Wed May 12 01:54:40 CEST 2004
Tim Streater wrote: > I want to do something like the following: > > import: from as<number> accept NONE except > { > from community.contains(val-a) action community.append(val-aa); accept any; > from community.contains(val-b) action community.append(val-bb); accept any; > } > > That is to say, on my peering with as<number> I want to accept routes based on communities but add a new community based on the value of the existing one, and then accept the route. Is this a suitable syntax - except for the lack of a NONE keyword? Or can I fake this by using 0.0.0.0 instead of NONE? Or is there a better solution altogether? "NOT ANY" = NONE Mark.
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Specifying no routes
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]