This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Thu May 6 17:12:26 CEST 2004

>Why do you not just use IRT?
>
>The prime reason, with which I agree, is that there is this 'mandatory'
>encryption field. Two things:

  I have already polled the CERT community regarding the 'mandatory' for
  the key-cert attributes. As of today, I haven't heard anything which
  would prevent us from making those 'optional'.

  The NCC has confirmed that the modification would be straight-forward
  (and cheap :-).

  So this is solved, I think.
  Wilfried.

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]