[db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT

Hi,

On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:55:35PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Gert Doering wrote:
> > But even so: compared to the total number of IPv6 addresses covered
> > by the /32s allocated right now, your mnt-irt:s on a handful of /40s
> > are a good start but won't make a big numerical impact...
> 
> 50%+ does make some impact IMHO.

50% of the inet6num doesn't mean "50% of the IPv6 addresses covered" -
and that's my point.

My /32 alone has 256 times the number of IPv6 addresses in there as
a SiXXS /40 has - and none of them are covered by a mnt-irt: (yet).  So
in address coverage, the /40s will be "below 1%"...

So you need to be really careful which percent values you're discussing 
over... :-)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  60210  (58081)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299