This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Thu May 6 15:23:12 CEST 2004

On 6 May 2004, at 13:14, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote:

> That is where the -c kicks in. and for a good solution, id prefer a 
> shell -liner (similar to the one i presented in january) to update all 
> these (at once). I think this is bearable for the NOCs that care.

Fine.  That makes it less onerous, but why would I want to add

	abuse-c: NO8

to every object where I already have

	tech-c: NO8

?

I don't see the gain.

Now, I'm on a break with my family until Monday.
Have a good weekend, everyone!

Niall

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]