This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pim van Pelt
pim at bit.nl
Thu May 6 13:51:49 CEST 2004
Hi, Thanks for pointing this out. I was not familiar enough with the matter. Apparently Jeroen Massar is, as he headed the implementation of IRT in SixXS. I seem to have messed it up somewhat :-) | Hmm, this is nice, but not really necessary, because with the -c flag in | the whois-query you should get tho the allocated /40 anyway. | | i.e. your change should increase the # of objects, bur not the Footprint | of the IRT .. which was pointed out to me by other individuals as well. While we're on it (and I'm embarraed as it is), should I revert that software change and NOT set mnt-irt in the more specifics, or should I leave it as is. Opinions ? -- Met vriendelijke groet, BIT BV / Ing P.B. van Pelt PBVP1-RIPE (PGPKEY-4DCA7E5E)
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]